Sponsored Programs and Research Services

Research Environment Survey at CSU

2011 Survey Results - Research Environment (Award Set-Up & Post-Award)

2011 Survey Results

Back to All Survey Results

In this section, Respondents were asked to rate the quality of the existing service.
Then, they were asked to rate the importance of that service using the scale:

  • L = Low Importance (assigned a value of 1)
  • M = Medium Importance (assigned a value of 2)
  • H = High Importance (assigned a value of 3)

Because this is not a ranking exercise, multiple items can have the same importance rating.


Question: 1. General University support for the hiring of project staff.

Average Importance

2.31 (out of 3)

Total responses = 137


Question: 2. General University support for the hiring of graduate assistants.

Average Importance

2.57 (out of 3)

Total responses = 137


Question: 3. Distribution of SPRS internal Notices of Awards (NOAs).

Average Importance

2.30 (out of 3)

Total responses = 130


Question: 4. PeopleSoft reports (e.g., Gift Report, Transaction Register Report).

Average Importance

2.35 (out of 3)

Total responses = 129


Question: 5. Financial report preparation and submission to external sponsor.

Average Importance

2.51 (out of 3)

Total responses = 131


Question: 6. Support for preparation of applications to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) or other compliance-related matters.

Average Importance

2.38 (out of 3)

Total responses = 128


Question: 7. Re-budget of existing projects.

Average Importance

2.38 (out of 3)

Total responses = 134

Back to Main Survey