Sponsored Programs and Research Services

Research Environment at CSU

2010 Survey Results - Research Environment (Award Set-Up & Post-Award)

2010 Survey Results

Back to All Survey Results

In this section, Respondents were asked to rate the quality of the existing service.
Then, they were asked to rate the importance of that service using the scale:

  • L = Low Importance (assigned a value of 1)
  • M = Medium Importance (assigned a value of 2)
  • H = High Importance (assigned a value of 3)

Because this is not a ranking exercise, multiple items can have the same importance rating.


Question: 1. General University support for the hiring of project staff.

Average Importance

2.36 (out of 3)

Total responses = 170


Question: 2. General University support for the hiring of graduate assistants.

Average Importance

2.65 (out of 3)

Total responses = 171


Question: 3. Distribution of SPRS internal Notices of Awards (NOAs).

Average Importance

2.32 (out of 3)

Total responses = 161


Question: 4. PeopleSoft reports (e.g., Gift Report, Transaction Register Report).

Average Importance

2.35 (out of 3)

Total responses = 161


Question: 5. Financial report preparation and submission to external sponsor.

Average Importance

2.51 (out of 3)

Total responses = 162


Question: 6. Support for preparation of applications to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) or other compliance-related matters.

Average Importance

2.30 (out of 3)

Total responses = 164


Question: 7. Re-budget of existing projects.

Average Importance

2.36 (out of 3)

Total responses = 161

Back to Main Survey