2011 Survey Results - Research Environment (Award Set-Up & Post-Award)

Back to Main Survey

In this section, Respondents were asked to rate the quality of the existing service. Then, they were asked to rate the importance of that service using the scale

• L = Low Importance (assigned a value of 1)
• M = Medium Importance (assigned a value of 2)
• H = High Importance (assigned a value of 3)

Because this is not a ranking exercise, multiple items can have the same importance rating.

Question: 1. General University support for the hiring of project staff.

2010 Survey		Average Importance 2.36
	Total responses = 170.
2011 Survey		Average Importance 2.31
	Total responses = 137.

Question: 2. General University support for the hiring of graduate assistants.

2010 Survey		Average Importance 2.65
	Total responses = 171.
2011 Survey		Average Importance 2.57
	Total responses = 137.

Question: 3. Distribution of OSPR internal Notices of Awards (NOAs).

2010 Survey		Average Importance 2.32
	Total responses = 161.
2011 Survey		Average Importance 2.30
	Total responses = 130.

Question: 4. PeopleSoft reports (e.g., Gift Report, Transaction Register Report).

2010 Survey		Average Importance 2.35
	Total responses = 161.
2011 Survey		Average Importance 2.35
	Total responses = 129.

Question: 5. Financial report preparation and submission to external sponsor.

2010 Survey		Average Importance 2.51
	Total responses = 162.
2011 Survey		Average Importance 2.51
	Total responses = 131.

Question: 6. Support for preparation of applications to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) or other compliance-related matters.

2010 Survey		Average Importance 2.30
	Total responses = 164.
2011 Survey		Average Importance 2.38
	Total responses = 128.

<

Question: 7. Re-budget of existing projects.

2010 Survey		Average Importance 2.36
	Total responses = 161.
2011 Survey		Average Importance 2.38
	Total responses = 134.

Back to Main Survey