2010 Survey Results - Research Environment (Award Set-Up & Post-Award)

Back to Main Survey

In this section, Respondents were asked to rate the quality of the existing service. Then, they were asked to rate the importance of that service using the scale

• L = Low Importance (assigned a value of 1)
• M = Medium Importance (assigned a value of 2)
• H = High Importance (assigned a value of 3)

Because this is not a ranking exercise, multiple items can have the same importance rating.

Question: 1. General University support for the hiring of project staff.

Average Importance 2.36

Total responses = 170.

Question: 2. General University support for the hiring of graduate assistants.

Average Importance 2.65

Total responses = 171.

Question: 3. Distribution of OSPR internal Notices of Awards (NOAs).

Average Importance 2.32

Total responses = 161.

Question: 4. PeopleSoft reports (e.g., Gift Report, Transaction Register Report).

Average Importance 2.35

Total responses = 161.

Question: 5. Financial report preparation and submission to external sponsor.

Average Importance 2.51

Total responses = 162.

Question: 6. Support for preparation of applications to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) or other compliance-related matters.

Average Importance 2.30

Total responses = 164.

Question: 7. Re-budget of existing projects.

Average Importance 2.36

Total responses = 161.

Back to Main Survey