Hill, Edward W., Lakewood needs West End redevelopment, Plain Dealer, May 19, 2003.
PREVIEW
How does a city balance its financial viability against the rights of a small
portion of its population? That is the question that Lakewood's City Council
faces tonight on the West End project.
The project is a combination of up to 275 condominiums with retail shops, restaurants
and a multiscreen movie theater. Jess Bell Jr., president of Bonne Bell Inc.,
said that his cosmetics company, with its $10 million payroll and $200,000 in
local tax payments, would consider staying in Lakewood's West End as part of
the project. Without it, the company's location goes into play, with Lakewood
holding a losing hand. The value of the project without Bonne Bell is estimated
at $151 million. The developers have a reputation for doing quality work; they
are committed to "new urbanist," street-friendly designs. What's not
to like?
Hill, Edward W., Set
a development agenda, Inside Business, March 2002, 34-35
PREVIEW
The pain of the current recession and the loss of LTV is leading many to overlook
the region's real competitive strengths.
Northeast Ohio is a world-class center of high-value manufacturing production,
and it has a technologically intense economy based on the application of chemistry,
metallurgy, and, increasingly, information technology.
Saying Northeast Ohio is not a "high-tech" region is a misinformed
assertion.
Indeed, 6.9 percent of all private-sector employment in the Cleveland area is
in technology-intense occupations, while in the Akron area that figure is 6.1
percent. The U.S. average is 7 percent.
Therefore, Northeast Ohio's economic doldrums are not based on the technology
used to make things; they are based on what is made. Northeast Ohio's companies
are not innovating new products.
Hill, Edward W., Factories
will manufacture region's recovery, Crain's Cleveland Business
October 22-28, 2001.
PREVIEW
As Northeast Ohio confronts another economic downturn, pundits are busy declaring
our existing economic base dead, looking to other regions to figure out what
should be done next. In the 1979 to 1983 recession, the touted panacea to the
region's economic woes was services. In the 1990 recession, it was computers.
Today, the path to success is supposed to lie with the "New Economy."
In the two previous recessions, manufacturing and process innovations within
manufacturing led this region's recovery. It will do so again. Manufacturing
will lead the recovery because there is no such thing as the New Economy. There
is only a dynamic economy where markets are broader then ever, product life
cycles are shorter than ever, and information technology is part of business
infrastructure. The key to Northeast Ohio's future is to build from strength
and competitive advantage, not from weakness and competitive disadvantage -
and that is manufacturing.
Hill, Edward W., The Cleveland economy: A case study of economic
restructuring. In W. Dennis Keating, Norman Krumholz and David Perry (eds.)
Cleveland: A metropolitan reader (Kent, OH: Kent State University Press,
1995): 53-86. Parts of this chapter have been subsequently reprinted as: A city
built on work, Cleveland Plain Dealer, October 7, 1997 and Bingham et
al., Beyond edge cities (NY: Garland Publishing, 1997) pp.56-61.
ABSTRACT
In 1978 everything seemed to come apart in Cleveland: politically, the mayor
survived a voter recall by 236 votes; fiscally, Cleveland was the first city
to suffer a bond default since the Great Depression; and ecologically, Lake
Erie was declared dead. Coterminous with these disasters, the economy of Greater
Cleveland experienced an irreparable secular erosion of its durable goods base,
starting in the third quarter of 1979 and continuing until the first quarter
of 1983, signaling the end of the old economic order. This essay discusses Cleveland's
shift from the old to a new order economy. A brief description of the emergence
of the industrial old order economy is followed by an analysis of the new economic
structure. This analysis suggests that the new economic structure involves more
than the numbers of jobs lost or changed. It is also evident in changes in the
incidence of poverty, the relative costs of housing, and the occupational characteristics
of the residential labor force.
Hill, Edward W. An
Economic View of Land Development, Citizen Participation, a publication
of the Citizens League of Greater Cleveland (June, 1998): p. 10 & 12.
PREVIEW
In April 1998, the Citizens League of Greater Cleveland surveyed public attitudes
about farmland and open space among Northeast Ohio's residents as part of its
"Rating the Region" project. Nearly two-thirds of the respondents
agreed that "loss of farmland and open space to new development" is
a serious problem. It is no surprise that three-quarters of residents in fast-growing
Medina and Geauga Counties agreed with the statement.
Similarly, more than 70 percent of the residents in rural Portage and Ashtabula
Counties disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement: "it is better
to build new neighborhoods in suburban and rural areas instead of investing
in neighborhoods in urban areas." Anti-sprawl activists have joined hands
with ecologists, lobbyists for farmland preservation, and rural residents who
want close the door to development behind them in arguing that there is a special
value in preserving land that is farmed in the outlying portions of the metropolitan
area. Such sentiments are fine, laudable, and, if not accompanied by someone's
checkbook-meaningless.
Hill, Edward W., The
Future of Northeast Ohio's Airports: Providing a regional solution,
Akron Beacon-Journal, November 15, 1997; also printed in Crain's Cleveland
Business, December 8, 1997.
PREVIEW
Over the course of the past 10 or more years, community leaders have engaged
in considerable debate regarding the future of Northeast Ohio's air service
capabilities. No one has questioned the importance of providing superior air
transportation in and out of Northeast Ohio; in fact, quite the opposite is
true. Leaders are in strong agreement that air service is critical to the continued
economic growth of this area. They are not in agreement, however, as to how
that service can best be delivered. While the cities of Brook Park and Cleveland
have come to an agreement on the expansion of Cleveland Hopkins International
Airport, ongoing discussions continue regarding the development of a new regional
airport, possibly at the largely abandoned Ravenna Arsenal property.
It is clear to me, however, that the best course of action is one that has not yet been discussed. The solution to volume constraints lies in maximizing existing air service capacity and in making incremental investments that improve the competitive position of all of Northeast Ohio's airports.
Hill, Edward W., Vouchers
Are Not Enough, (Cleveland) Plain Dealer, September 28, 1994.
PREVIEW
Mayors of big cities and older suburbs should thank state courts - such as Ohio's
- for striking down property-tax-based school-funding forumulas. These decisions
offer a chance to save older neighborhoods and help cities hold onto middle-class
residents.
There is no constitutional reason for tying school funding reform to public
education reform. But if state legislatures look at these constitutional challenges
as no more than a money problem, they will forfeit a historical opportunity.
Meaningful school reform can stabilize urban neighborhoods by breaking the connection
between school and residence and promoting desegregation, while strengthening
public education.
This requires school choice and competition between publicly supported schools.
But simpleminded voucher schemes do nothing to break the link connecting residence
and school selection. Such plans offer choice only within existing school districts,
which remain segregated if districts are products of housing segregation. Choice
that saves neighborhoods requires districts that are representative of metropolitan
areas.
Hill, Edward W., Perspective: Contested
Cleveland, Urban Affairs Association Newsletter (Winter 1992).
PREVIEW
How do you wrap your arms around a place like Cleveland? It cannot be done in
a simple way, and no single "fact" or metaphor will give you a complete
picture. All you can do is grapple with images of the city and region, images
that have become caricatures which both inform and distort. They compete for
our attention and understanding and yield views that are incomplete without
others. Three images dominate the national view of Cleveland.
© 2013 Cleveland State University | 2121 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115-2214 | 216.687.2000