The similarities of the relationships between the two pairs of men are
illustrated in the following quotations. The first is from Eco's The Name of
the Rose, and the second is from Conan Doyle's The Adventure of the Dancing
Men.
"'A fine mess,'" William said (p. 105) [Judy
Bolinger comments] Eco, with
his delightful sense of humor and his keen sense of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's
Sherlock Holmes stories seems to be challenging us as to whether this scene
sounds familiar. It is straight out of The Bascombe Valley Mystery (P
281-282) "...and there were marks of many feet, both upon the path and amid
the short grass which bounded it on either side. Sometimes Holmes would
hurry on...'Oh how simple it would all have been had I been here before they
came like a herd of buffalo and wallowed all over it.'' Both detectives,
William and Holmes, needed the information that footprints would give them.
Both had to deal with many additional prints obscuring their evidence.
"Omnis mundi creatura . . ." (p. 106): [Marilyn Sutton
comments] When William of Baskerville begins
to talk of signs with regard to the death of Venantius, Adso, being the
good student, recalls William's allusion during the Brunellus incident (p.
23) to a text from Alanus de Insulis ).
The translation of the Alanus de Insulis text at the bottom of page 23 is:
Every creature of the world
Like a picture and a book ==> Like a scripture and a book
Appears to us as a mirror.
Here Adso misquotes Alain, changing in the second line the word pictura
(picture) to scriptura (scripture). The message is slightly altered: every
creature speaks to us like a scripture. Alain taught that God created
Nature as man's intermediary. Perhaps Adso inadvertently is saying that the
scriptures are also God's intermediaries.
Sources:
"Alain de I'Isle." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. Online edition. 1999.
Haft, Adele J., Jane G. White, Robert J. White. The Key to the Name of the
Rose. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999. 100, 115-16.
Greek pharmacon meaning both "poison" and "medicine" (p. 108):
the word is thus an exemplar of the dual meanings of
symbols in bono and in malo, like the cock,
cited by Adso at the beginning of this chapter (p. 101).
There is a parallel in the scholastic view of philosophy, such that
"philosophy" is like "pharmacon," having meaning in bono and
in malo. Humbert de Romans, Master General of the Dominicans in 1254-1263, wrote an influential
Commentary on the Rule of St. Augustine (ca. 1256-1263),
in which he allows that some friars are unsuited to the
study of philosophy, and others can be allowed to study
philosophy a little, under supervision, while still other
friars should be given free rein to study philosophy as they will.
Humbert's Commentary includes an exegesis of Collossians 2:8, "Beware
lest any man deceive by philosophy and vain conceit."
He argues that "just as a man cannot defend against fallacies,
if he knows nothing about them, so can he not defend against
such philosophers, if he knows nothing about philosophy.
Then, in addition to defending against false philosophy,
another result of studying philosophy is "the destruction of their
errors. Amont the philosophers, there are many errors and many
truths, just as there is both poison and its antidote in the
serpent. And just as this antidote is more efficacious
than all else against poison, so are their truths more
effective in opposing their errors than are the truths
of faith, for they do not accept the latter."
There is no reason the think that Eco was thinking of Humbert's
Commentary at this point, of course. But in more
general terms, William of Baskerville takes a position in favor
of the study of philosophy, as the best defense against the
expected Antichrist.
The next study page is Second Day: Prime (pp. 110-20)